Sample Readiness Scorecard
This is what a manager sees after a trainee completes a Benchmark workflow simulation. The score is tied to observable evidence—selected facts, decisions, roleplay transcript, and documentation—not vibes. Use it to see who's ready for light supervision and what to coach next.
Attempt summary
- Learner
- Alex Rivera
- Role
- UR new hire
- Scenario
- UR Readiness Check: Inpatient Pneumonia Admit
- Attempt date
- March 2, 2026 at 2:14 PM
- Duration
- 14m 32s
- Status
- Completed
Readiness
82 / 100
DevelopingProceed with targeted coaching before independent handling.
Critical fails: None
Hints used: 2 (max level: 2)
Subscores
- Fact triage21 / 25
- Documentation gaps18 / 25
- Decision quality12 / 15
- Roleplay communication17 / 20
- Documentation note8 / 10
- Independence4 / 5
Top strengths
- Correctly prioritized key severity markers (O2 requirement, tachypnea).
- Clear plan to request missing documentation from provider.
- Professional response to payer pushback.
Top misses
- Did not explicitly call out the "why inpatient today" narrative gap until prompted.
- Documentation request lacked one or two concrete elements (e.g., expected LOS / monitoring rationale).
Recommended coaching actions
- Provide a template phrase for "why inpatient today" justification.
- Practice one more roleplay focusing on concise inpatient rationale + documentation request.
Score based on observable actions (selected facts, decisions, transcript, documentation fields).
Evidence
Managers can expand each section to see exactly what the trainee did. No guesswork.
A — Selected facts
- ✅ SpO2 90% RA → 94% on 2L NC
- ✅ Respiratory rate 24 (tachypnea)
- ✅ IV antibiotics started in ED and continued
- ✅ WBC 14.8 (elevated)
- ✅ Comorbidities: COPD, CHF (stable), DM2
- ✅ H&P does not clearly state why inpatient vs observation
- ⚠️ Lives with spouse (low value for UR)
B — Documentation gaps response
• H&P lacks explicit 'why inpatient today' narrative. • O2 requirement and respiratory findings not clearly tied to severity. • No documented expected LOS or next reassessment.
C — Decision selection
Chosen: Request additional documentation + Prepare for payer discussion
Timeframe: Today
D — Roleplay transcript (summary)
Learner summarized key clinical facts (O2, tachypnea, IV abx), acknowledged documentation gap, and stated plan to request provider clarification and prepare for concurrent review.
E — Note output
Status support: 72M pneumonia, O2 requirement, tachypneic; continue IV abx. Requested: clarify inpatient vs obs rationale, O2/severity, expected LOS. Escalation: None. Payer contact: No. Follow-up: Today.
Get this for your team
Custom workflow simulations, rubric-aligned scoring, and manager-ready scorecards for CM/UR onboarding. Cut shadowing time in half.